Will Iceland become an economic wilderness?
As we have seen in the news, since the credit crisis and the collapse of Icelandic banks, that voters in Iceland have overwhelmingly rejected proposals to pay the UK and the Netherlands in the wake of the collapse of the Icesave bank – in fact with just one third of results counted, 93% of voters said “No” in a referendum!
As a result of the credit crisis and the collapse of the banking system, governments around the world pumped billions into the system to prevent complete melt-down. The British and Dutch governments paid compensation of £3.4 Billion (€3.8 Billion; $5.2 Billion) to customers directly affected as a result of the collapse of Icesave bank and are seeking reimbursement from Iceland for this.
It is right (perhaps?) that the Iceland Government have sought the views of Icelanders (perhaps our own government should have doe the same with us before doing the bail-outs they did!) before making any such reimbursement, but are they being short sighted?
Are the Icelandic people not seeing the bigger picture and will their economy become a wasteland where no world economy will risk investing again? The world economy is a small place these days and works as if it were one, which is more apparent today than it has ever been before.
With the advent of the Internet and with world economies being highly inter-dependent it is vital for economies to recognise how they could quite easily become black listed for what could be deemed to be ‘Bad Trading’. For example, would you lend to someone a second time when they had reneged on a deal or failed to repay a loan the first time? It is important to recognise that the Iceland government is not contractually due to pay the £3.4 Billion, but perhaps morally it is and if it wants to be taken seriously in the financial world economy again then the Icelandic government needs to take responsibility for the actions of the bank that failed on their own shores.
It is important for Icelanders to recognise that the Iceland economy benefited hugely from the positive effects of the boom times, but appear to be unwilling to payout when times are tough. They are not willing to put their hands in the pockets that were lined from profits made as a result of people believing in their banks when things were good, to help out the governments of the countries that helped them line their pockets in the first place.










