Allstate, the US insurance giant, has brought in investment bank JPMorgan, alongside advisers Lehman Brothers, to arrange the financing for its estimated £7bn tilt at Royal Bank of Scotland’s insurance arm (RBSi).

Allstate is thought to be the front-runner in an auction for the unit, with Zurich pulling out of the running last week.

The interest of the remaining bidders, Germany’s Allianz and the American Travelers group, is thought to have cooled. Allianz’s sale of its Dresdner banking arm is thought to have scuppered its chances of making a serious offer.

However, sources close to the deal believe that Sir Fred Goodwin, chief executive of RBS, is increasingly likely to pull out of a sale, with indicative bids thought to be some way short of the asking price.

“This deal will only happen if Fred needs the extra cash to shore up the balance sheet further,” said a source.

The London-based corporate adviser Fenchurch, which counts Ian Chippendale, the former boss of RBS’s insurance division, among its number, is also part of the Allstate advisory team.

News reported by The Independent

Top City practitioners and regulators have been summoned to the Treasury tomorrow to discuss reforming the rights issue process, in the wake of the chaos surrounding the recent cash calls undertaken by the UK’s troubled banks.

The Treasury is determined to push for changes to the process, which became more controversial following the crisis cash calls launched by HBOS, RBS and Bradford & Bingley to shore up their balance sheets. If agreement can be reached with practitioners over the next few weeks, the Treasury hopes to put recommendations in place by the end of the summer.

One source said: “The Treasury is genuinely shocked by the disastrous way the recent rights issues by the banks were undertaken. It’s bad for the companies in trouble but also bad for London as a financial centre. Officials understand that the system of raising money needs to be speeded up and improved.”

Tom Scholar, managing director of the Treasury’s financial services unit, and Kitty Ussher, Economic Secretary at No 11, are both involved in the planned reforms, which are likely to include speeding up the process and reducing requirements such as issuing a full prospectus.

This is the first meeting of the rights-issue working party, set up after the Treasury announced its review a few weeks ago. Bankers and investors will be at the meeting along with representatives from the Financial Services Authority and Bank of England. Any reforms will require new legislation.

One banker who will be at the meeting said: “This debate has been going on for decades. But for the first time there is a sense of urgency from all parties. It’s no longer about paper-pushing. Everyone wants changes.”

The UK is the only country to give investors pre-emption rights over shares, giving them first refusal on new shares in proportion to their existing holdings.

But the system has come under attack from big US investment banks such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. They have argued that the UK should adopt their placement process, which is quicker; however, even they now accept the principle of pre-emption and are pushing only for the process to be made more efficient and faster.

“There is now a consensus. This is a great opportunity for reform,” said another source.

The working party will consider removing the need for a full prospectus, tightening the timetable so that the period needed for an extraordinary general meeting can be shorter, and introducing a twin-track system for institutions and retail investors.

Paul Myners, a non-executive director of the Bank of England, who led a study of pre-emption rights three years ago, said that the Treasury only had to pull out his report to see what changes needed to be made. Mr Myners recommended a trading update be issued rather than a prospectus, and that EGM notice periods be cut to seven days. He said that nothing in his proposals threatened the interests of companies or their shareholders.

News reported by The Independent

Royal Bank of Scotland shareholders have agreed to buy more than 95% of the shares offered in a £12bn rights issue.

The rights issue is the biggest in UK corporate history, and the firm said investors would take up 5.8bn new shares at a value of 200 pence each.

But shares in RBS ended 5% lower in London at 234 pence.

The bank is not alone in having to ask investors for extra cash after problems in the world credit and US housing markets cut the value of its assets.

Banking sector blues

HBOS and Bradford & Bingley have also asked their investors for extra cash.

Analysts are particularly concerned that HBOS, which was formed by the merger of Bank of Scotland and Halifax, will struggle to raise the £4bn it requires to help restore the bank’s finances.

This is because private investors, rather than institutional investors, dominate its share base and are generally less supportive of rights issues.

HBOS’s shares ended 7.2% lower, while Barclays shares fell almost 6% on speculation that it would be the next bank to try and sell new shares.

“It’s a good level of takeup for one of the biggest ever rights issues, done in not easy circumstances” Alan Beaney, Principal Investment Management

Check RBS’s share price

Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) shares have more than halved in value over the past year – including a 25% slump since the rights issue was announced in April.

Despite a brief rally last week, analysts warned that the bank and its shares may remain under pressure in the coming weeks.

Fundraising

RBS and other banks have suffered from a drop in the value of risky assets, particularly those focused on US sub-prime mortgages.

Sub-prime borrowers are those with poor or non-existent credit histories, and in recent months the number of defaults has jumped.

As a result, many lenders have had to find ways of boosting their cash reserves.

RBS’s circumstances have been exacerbated after it headed a group that bought Dutch lender ABN Amro for 71bn euros last year.

There are about 200,000 RBS shareholders; 93% of the shares are held by major investors, such as pension funds, with the other 7% owned by private individuals.

Shareholders are generally not keen on new share issues because it means that their investments are diluted, the firms’ earnings are spread more thinly and each share takes a smaller slice of the company’s earnings.

To compensate for these downsides, they are offered the shares at a discount to the market price so they could sell for a quick profit.

“It’s a good level of takeup for one of the biggest ever rights issues, done in not easy circumstances,” said Alan Beaney, head of investment at Principal Investment Management.

“The company (RBS) is still trading reasonably well and now doesn’t have that capital worry so maybe it can be knocked forward now.”

News reported by BBC